Network Working Group A. Newton [-Internet-Draft-] {+Request for Comments: 3982+} VeriSign, Inc. [-Expires: January 11, 2005-] {+Category: Standards Track+} M. Sanz DENIC eG [-July 13, 2004 IRIS --] {+January 2005 IRIS:+} A Domain Registry (dreg) Type for the Internet Registry Information Service [-draft-ietf-crisp-iris-dreg-07-] {+(IRIS)+} Status of [-this-] {+This+} Memo [-By submitting this Internet-Draft, I certify that any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which I am aware have been disclosed, and any of which I become aware will be disclosed, in accordance with RFC 3668. Internet-Drafts are working documents of-] {+This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for+} the Internet [-Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas,-] {+community,+} and [-its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid-] {+requests discussion and suggestions+} for [-a maximum-] {+improvements. Please refer to the current edition+} of [-six months-] {+the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state+} and [-may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." The list-] {+status+} of [-current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. The list-] {+this protocol. Distribution+} of [-Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. This Internet-Draft will expire on January 11, 2005.-] {+this memo is unlimited.+} Copyright Notice Copyright (C) The Internet Society [-(2004). All Rights Reserved.-] {+(2005).+} Abstract This document describes an [-IRIS-] {+Internet Registry Information Service (IRIS)+} registry schema for registered DNS information. The schema extends the necessary query and result operations of IRIS to provide the functional information service needs for syntaxes and results used by domain registries and registrars. [-Newton & Sanz Expires January 11, 2005 [Page 1] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-3-] {+2+} 2. Document Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-4-] {+3+} 3. Schema Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-5 3.1-] {+3 3.1.+} Query Derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-. 5 3.1.1-] {+3 3.1.1.+} Query . . . . . . . . . . [-. . . 5 3.1.2-] {+3 3.1.2.+} Query . . . . . . . . . . [-. . . 5 3.1.3-] {+4 3.1.3.+} Query . . . . . . . . . . . [-. . . 6 3.1.4-] {+4 3.1.4.+} Query . . . . . . . . . . . . [-. . . 6 3.1.5-] {+4 3.1.5.+} Query . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-. . . 6 3.1.6-] {+5 3.1.6.+} Query . . . . . . . . . . . [-. . . 7 3.1.7-] {+5 3.1.7.+} Contact Search Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-. . . 7 3.2-] {+5 3.2.+} Result Derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-. 8 3.2.1-] {+6 3.2.1.+} Privacy Labels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-. . . 8 3.2.2-] {+6 3.2.2.+} Result . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-. . . 9 3.2.3-] {+7 3.2.3.+} Result . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-. . . 11 3.2.4-] {+10 3.2.4.+} Result . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-. . . 12 3.2.5-] {+11 Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 1] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg January 2005 3.2.5.+} . . . . . . . . . . . . [-. . .-] 13 [-3.3-] {+3.3.+} Generic Code Derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-. 14 3.3.1-] {+13 3.3.1.+} . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-. . . 14 3.3.2-] {+13 3.3.2.+} . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-. . . 15 3.4-] {+14 3.4.+} Support for . . . . . . . . . . . . [-. 15-] {+14+} 4. Formal XML Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-16-] {+15+} 5. BEEP Transport Compliance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-38 5.1-] {+36 5.1.+} Message Pattern . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-. 38 5.2-] {+36 5.2.+} Server Authentication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-. 38-] {+36+} 6. URI Resolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-39 6.1-] {+36 6.1.+} Application Service Label . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-. 39 6.2-] {+36 6.2.+} Bottom-Up Resolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-. 39 6.3-] {+37 6.3.+} Top-Down Resolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-. 39-] {+37+} 7. Internationalization Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-41-] {+38+} 8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-42 8.1-] {+38 8.1.+} XML Namespace URN Registration . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-. 42 8.2-] {+38 8.2.+} S-NAPTR Registration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-. 42 8.3-] {+39 8.3.+} BEEP Registration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-. 42-] {+39+} 9. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-43-] {+39+} 10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-44 10.1-] {+. 39 10.1.+} Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-. . 44 10.2-] {+39 10.2.+} Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . {+40 A. Examples of Requests and Responses+} . . [-45 Authors' Addresses-] . . . . . . . . . . . . {+41 A.1. Example 1+} . . . . . . . . . . [-46 A. Example Requests and Responses-] . . . . . . . . . . . . . {+41 A.2. Example 2+} . . . [-47 A.1 Example 1-] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . {+42 A.3. Example 3+} . . . . [-47 A.2 Example 2-] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . {+43 B. An Example of Database Serialization+} . . . . . [-48 A.3 Example 3-] . . . . . . . . {+47 C. Acknowledgements+} . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [-49 B. An Example Database Serialization-] . . . . . . . {+48 Authors' Addresses+} . . . . . . . [-53 C. Acknowledgements-] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . {+49 Full Copyright Statement+} . . . . . . [-55 Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements-] . . . . . . . . [-56 Newton & Sanz Expires January 11, 2005 [Page 2] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] {+. . . . . . . 50+} 1. Introduction This document describes an IRIS registry schema for Internet domain registries using an XML Schema [4] derived from and using the IRIS [5] schema. The query and result types outlined in this document are based on the functional requirements described in CRISP [17]. The schema given is this document is specified {+by+} using the Extensible Markup Language (XML) [-1.0-] {+1.0,+} as described in XML [-[1],-] {+[1];+} XML Schema [-notation-] {+notation,+} as described in XML_SD [3] and XML_SS [-[4],-] {+[4];+} and XML [-Namespaces-] {+Namespaces,+} as described in XML_NS [2]. Examples of client/server XML exchanges with this registry type are available in Appendix A. Newton & Sanz [-Expires-] {+Standards Track [Page 2] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg+} January [-11,-] 2005 [-[Page 3] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] 2. Document Terminology The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [-RFC2119-] {+BCP 14, RFC 2119+} [10]. [-Newton & Sanz Expires January 11, 2005 [Page 4] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] 3. Schema Description IRIS requires the derivation of both query and result elements by a registry [-schemas.-] {+schema.+} These descriptions follow. References to XML elements [-with no-] {+without a+} namespace qualifier are from the schema defined in Section 4. References to elements and attributes with the "iris" XML namespace qualifier are from the schema defined in IRIS [5]. The descriptions contained within this section refer to XML elements and attributes and their relation to the exchange of data within the protocol. These descriptions also contain specifications outside the scope of the formal XML syntax. [-Therefore, this-] {+This+} section will use terms defined by RFC 2119 [10] to describe [-the specification outside the scope of the formal XML syntax.-] {+these.+} While reading this section, please reference Section 4 for needed details on the formal XML syntax. [-3.1-] {+3.1.+} Query Derivatives [-3.1.1-] {+3.1.1.+} Query searches for a registration authority designated as a registrar for the registry of the server. If present, the element MUST restrict the results of the search to [-only-] registrars capable of registering subdomains in the domain signified by the content of this element. The element restricts the scope of the query with its child elements. The element specifies the beginning of the registrar's name. The element specifies the end of the registrar's name. The element specifies [-an-] equivalence to the registrar's name. If the element is not present, the query MUST return all registrars applicable [-(i.e.-] {+(i.e.,+} in consideration of ). This query MUST return a result set of zero or more elements. See Section 3.2.5. [-3.1.2-] {+Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 3] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg January 2005 3.1.2.+} Query finds domains by searches on fields associated with a domain's contact. A search constraint of MUST restrict the results to domains [-only-] underneath the domain specified by its [-content-] {+content,+} if it is present. [-Newton & Sanz Expires January 11, 2005 [Page 5] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] The allowable search fields are handled with either the element or one of the elements in the "contactSearchGroup" (see Section 3.1.7). The element allows [-for-] the domains to be selected based on the contact having the specified contact handle. The query MAY also be constrained further {+by+} using the optional element. The contents of this element signify the role the contact has with the domain. This query also provides optional elements containing language tags. Clients MAY use these elements to [-give a-] hint about the natural language(s) of the affected element. Servers MAY use this information in processing the query, such as {+in+} tailoring normalization routines to aid in more effective searches. [-3.1.3-] {+3.1.3.+} Query The query finds domains by the name of a domain as it is known in DNS. The element restricts the scope of the query with its child elements. The element specifies the beginning of the domain name. The element specifies the end of the domain name. [-3.1.4-] {+3.1.4.+} Query This query differs from the query by allowing the scope of the query to take [-into consideration-] internationalized domain [-names.-] {+names into consideration.+} This query will return the union of the desired domain and any associated variants, therefore differing from a lookup in the "idn" entity class (Section 3.4) (which [-is to-] only [-return-] {+returns+} the domain or no results). The element restricts the scope of the query with its child element. Its child, the element, is designed to contain IDNs and not ACE labels, and thus MUST match only against equivalent IDNs, according to the notion of equivalence defined in RFC 3490 [14]. This query also provides optional elements containing language tags. Clients MAY use these elements to [-give a-] hint about the {+Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 4] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg January 2005+} natural language(s) of the affected element. Servers MAY use this information in processing the query, such as {+in+} tailoring normalization routines to aid in more effective searches. [-3.1.5-] {+3.1.5.+} Query searches for contacts given search constraints. [-Newton & Sanz Expires January 11, 2005 [Page 6] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] The allowable search fields are handled by one of the elements in the "contactSearchGroup" (see Section 3.1.7). This query also provides optional elements containing language tags. Clients MAY use these elements to [-give a-] hint about the natural language(s) of the affected element. Servers MAY use this information in processing the query, such as {+in+} tailoring normalization routines to aid in more effective searches. [-3.1.6-] {+3.1.6.+} Query This query does a simple search for the domains being hosted by a name server. The search is constrained {+by+} using either the host name [12], host handle, IPv4 address, or IPv6 address of the name server. [-3.1.7-] {+3.1.7.+} Contact Search Group Some of the queries above have similar query constraints for searching on contacts. This section describes those common parameters. allows the query to be constrained based on the common name of the contact. The constraint can [-either-] constrain the query {+either+} by an exact match using the element, or [-it may constrain the query-] by a subset of the common name using the and elements. allows the query to be constrained based on the organization name of the contact. It has the same semantics as the element. constrains the query based on the e-mail address of the contact. This may be done by an exact e-mail address using the element or by any e-mail address in a domain using the element. The {+element+} MUST only contain a valid domain name [-(i.e. no-] {+(i.e., without an+} '@' symbol), and the matching SHOULD take place only on the domain given [-(i.e.-] {+(i.e.,+} no partial matches with respect to substrings or parent domains). If either the contents of the element or {+the+} domain part of the contents of the element contain a name with non-ASCII characters, they MUST be normalized according to the processes of RFC 3491 [15]. {+Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 5] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg January 2005+} The , , and elements restrict the scope of the query based on the city, region, or postal code of the contact, respectively. Each [-one-] must only contain an element containing the exact city, region, or postal code [-(i.e.-] {+(i.e.,+} no substring searches). [-Newton & Sanz Expires January 11, 2005 [Page 7] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004 3.2-] {+3.2.+} Result Derivatives [-3.2.1-] {+3.2.1.+} Privacy Labels Several of the results in this registry type have values that cannot be given but must be specified as present or must be flagged so that clients do not divulge them. In order to achieve this, some of the results use the following element types: o "dateTimePrivacyType" [---] {+--+} contains the XML Schema [3] data type "dateTime". The contents of this element MUST be specified {+by+} using the 'Z' indicator for Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). o "stringPrivacyType" [---] {+--+} contains the XML Schema [3] data type "string". o "normalizedStringPrivacyType" [---] {+--+} contains the XML Schema [3] data type "normalizedString". o "tokenPrivacyType" [---] {+--+} contains the XML Schema [3] data type "token". o "domainStatusType" [---] {+--+} contains [-an-] {+the+} optional element of [--] {+,+} indicating the date and time {+when+} the status was [-applied-] {+applied,+} and [-an-] {+the+} optional element of with {+the+} required attribute [-'language'-] {+'language',+} indicating a description of the status. This element also has [-an-] {+the+} optional attribute [-of 'scope' to indicate-] {+'scope', indicating+} the scope or origin of the status value. o "contactTypeType" [---] {+--+} contains [-an-] optional child elements. Each child element requires a 'language' attribute. As specified, [-they are nillable-] {+these elements can have nil values+} and therefore may be present with empty content or present with their specified content. The use of these elements is also optional. If present without content, each of these element types MUST have one or more of the following boolean attributes: o 'private' [-- if-] {+-- If+} true, this specifies that the content is absent because it may never be published. {+Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 6] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg January 2005+} o 'denied' [-- if-] {+-- If+} true, this specifies that the content is absent because policy does not allow it to be given [-under-] {+at+} the current level of access. If present with content, each of these element types MAY have one or more of the following boolean attributes: o 'doNotRedistribute' [-- if-] {+-- If+} true, this specifies that the content is not to be redistributed. o 'specialAccess' [-- if-] {+-- If+} true, this specifies that the content has been provided due to special access rights. These boolean attributes SHOULD be used in accordance with the level of access [-being-] granted {+to+} the [-recepient-] {+recipient+} of the data. For example, [-Newton & Sanz Expires January 11, 2005 [Page 8] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] marking data as 'private' or 'denied' is to be expected if the user is anonymous or has some other low level of access that does not warrant viewing [-of-] that particular data. Likewise, data marked with 'doNotRedistribute' or 'specialAccess' is to be expected if the user is authenticated and has a high level of access. [-3.2.2-] {+3.2.2.+} Result An example of a result: example.com tcs-com-1 {+Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 7] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg January 2005+} The result represents an instance of a domain assignment. The children of the element are as follows: o [---] {+--+} the full name of the domain as it is in DNS. The contents of this element MUST be a domain name as specified by RFC 1035 [9]. o [---] {+--+} the name of the domain in nameprep [-form-] {+form,+} if applicable. See RFC 3491 [15]. o [---] {+--+} a registry unique assigned identifier [-to-] {+for+} a domain. o [---] {+--+} MUST contain an entity reference to a referent of type (Section 3.2.3). [-Newton & Sanz Expires January 11, 2005 [Page 9] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] o [-- an element containing-] {+-- contains+} an entity reference to the registrant of this domain. The referent MUST be a {+result+} (Section [-3.2.4) result.-] {+3.2.4).+} o Domain contacts [---] {+--+} the following elements contain an entity reference with a relationship to the domain. The referent of each MUST be a (Section 3.2.4). * * * * * * * * o [---] {+-- This+} may contain at least one of the following elements of type 'domainStatusType' (see Section 3.2.1), but none of these elements may appear more than once. * [---] {+--+} permanently inactive * [---] {+--+} normal state * [---] {+--+} registration assigned but delegation inactive * [---] {+--+} dispute * [---] {+--+} database purge pending * [---] {+--+} change of authority pending * [---] {+--+} on hold by registry * [---] {+--+} on hold by registrar {+Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 8] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg January 2005+} o [---] {+--+} contains an entity reference, the referent of which MUST be a (Section 3.2.2). o [-- an element containing-] {+-- contains+} an entity reference, the referent of which MUST be a (Section 3.2.2). [-The intention of this-] {+This+} element is {+intended+} to point to the downstream registration reference. Therefore, if this is a result given back by a domain registry, it should point to the domain in the domain registrar or registrant service. o [---] {+--+} contains an entity reference specifying the domain registry operator for this [-domain-] {+domain,+} which MUST be a (Section 3.2.5). This element has an [-optional,-] {+optional+} boolean 'hosting' attribute. When the value of this attribute is positive, it indicates that the registry is responsible for [-authoratively-] {+authoritatively+} answering DNS queries for this domain. o [---] {+--+} contains an entity reference specifying the domain registrar operator for this [-domain-] {+domain,+} which MUST be a (Section 3.2.5). This element has an [-optional,-] {+optional+} boolean 'hosting' attribute. When the value of this attribute is positive, it indicates that the registrar is responsible for authoratively answering DNS queries for this domain. [-Newton & Sanz Expires January 11, 2005 [Page 10] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] o [-- an element containing-] {+-- contains+} the date and time of the initial delegation of this domain. o [-- an element containing-] {+-- contains+} the date and time of last renewal of this domain. o [-- an element containing-] {+-- contains+} the date and time of the expiration of this domain. o [---] {+--+} specifies the last time a contact for the domain was added or removed. o [-- an element containing-] {+-- contains+} an entity reference. The referent MUST be a (Section 3.2.4) responsible for the last addition or removal of a contact for this domain. o [-- an element containing-] {+-- contains+} the date and time of the last time one of the nameservers was added or removed for the delegation of this domain. {+Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 9] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg January 2005+} o [-- an element containing-] {+-- contains+} an entity reference. The referent MUST be a {+result+} (Section 3.2.4) [-result-] and {+MUST+} be responsible for the last addition or removal of a nameserver for this domain. o [-- an element containing-] {+-- contains+} the date and time of the last time the data for this domain was verified by the responsible registration authority. o [-- an element containing-] {+-- contains+} an entity reference specifying a referent [-that is-] indirectly associated with this domain. [-3.2.3-] {+3.2.3.+} Result An example of a result: nsol184 a.iana-servers.net 192.0.2.43 The element represents an instance of a host registration. The children of the element are as follows: o [---] {+--+} a registry unique assigned identifier for the host. o [---] {+--+} the fully qualified domain name of the host. The contents of this element are a domain name and MUST conform to RFC 1035 [9]. [-Newton & Sanz Expires January 11, 2005 [Page 11] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] o [---] {+--+} the content of [-which-] {+this+} MUST conform to the a valid IP version 4 host [-address-] {+address,+} as specified by RFC 791 [8]. o [---] {+--+} the content of [-which-] {+this+} MUST conform to the a valid IP version 6 host [-address-] {+address,+} as specified by RFC 3513 [7]. o [-- an element containing-] {+-- contains+} an entity reference specifying a contact associated with this host. The referent MUST be (Section 3.2.4) results. {+Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 10] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg January 2005+} o [-- an element containing-] {+-- contains+} the date and time {+when+} this host was created. o [-- an element containing-] {+-- contains+} the date and time {+when+} this host was last modified. o [-- an element containing-] {+-- contains+} the date and time {+when+} this data for this host was last verified to be correct by the appropriate registration authority. o [-- an element containing-] {+-- contains+} an entity reference specifying a referent [-that is-] indirectly associated with this host. [-3.2.4-] {+3.2.4.+} Result An example of a result: dbarton IANA Manager Internet Assigned Numbers Authority res-dom@iana.org
4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330
Marina del Rey CA 92092 US
[-310-823-9358-] {++1.3108239358+}
The element represents an instance of a contact registration. The children of the element are as follows: o [---] {+--+} a registry unique assigned identifier for this contact. o [---] {+--+} the name of the contact. o [---] {+--+} a specification of the language code to use to localize the data in this result. o [---] {+--+} contains one of the following child elements: , , , or . Each of these elements is a [-Newton & Sanz Expires January 11, 2005 [Page 12] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] "contactTypeType" as defined in Section 3.2.1. {+Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 11] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg January 2005+} o [-- an element containing-] {+-- contains+} the organization name of the contact. o [-- elements containing-] {+-- contains+} an e-mail address for this contact. o [-- elements containing-] {+-- contains+} an e-mail address within an internationalized domain name [14]. o [-- elements containing-] {+-- contains+} a SIP [-address-] {+URI+} for this contact. o [-- elements containing-] {+-- contains+} children representing a postal address. has the following children: *
[-- an element containing-] {+-- contains+} the street address for this contact. * [-- an element containing-] {+-- contains+} the city for this contact. * [-- an element containing-] {+-- contains+} the national region for this contact. * [-- an element containing-] {+-- contains+} the postal code for this contact. * [-- an element containing-] {+-- contains+} the country for this contact. This SHOULD be a [-2-letter-] {+two-letter+} country code compliant with ISO 3166 [11]. o [-- elements containing-] {+-- contains+} a voice phone number for this contact. If it begins with a '+' (plus) character, it MUST be a number defined by E164 [13]. The format number defined in E164 [13] is RECOMMENDED. o [-- elements containing-] {+-- contains+} a facsimile phone number for this contact. If it begins with a '+' (plus) character, it MUST be a number defined by E164 [13]. The format number defined in E164 [13] is RECOMMENDED. o [-- an element containing-] {+-- contains+} the date and time {+when+} this contact was created. o [-- an element containing-] {+-- contains+} the date and time {+when+} this contact was last modified. o [-- an element containing-] {+-- contains+} the date and time {+when+} this data for this contact was last verified to be correct by the appropriate registration authority. o [-- an element containing-] {+-- contains+} an entity reference specifying equivalents of this contact that have been translated into other languages. The referent MUST be {+results+} (Section [-3.2.4) results.-] {+3.2.4).+} o [-- an element containing-] {+-- contains+} an entity reference specifying a referent [-that is-] indirectly associated with this contact. [-3.2.5-] {+Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 12] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg January 2005 3.2.5.+} An example of a result: [-Newton & Sanz Expires January 11, 2005 [Page 13] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] Internet Assigned Numbers Authority The result represents an entity capable of registering domains. The child element of contains an entity reference pointing to the entity "id" in the entity class "iris". The authority areas found in the referent MUST be domains for which a given registration authority has control. The child element contains the name of the registration authority. The registration authority type child [-elements,-] {+elements+} , , and [-,-] {++} determine the role [-in which-] this registration authority plays in the process of registering domains. [-The intent of this-] {+This+} element is {+intended+} to explain the various roles a registration authority may have [-with regards to-] {+in+} the authority areas pointed to by the element. A client MAY understand the relationship of a registration authority with respect to a domain by the placement of the reference in the domain [-(e.g.-] {+(e.g.,+} or ). The child elements each contain one domain name signifying the domains for which this registration authority may register [-sub-domains. 3.3-] {+sub- domains. 3.3.+} Generic Code Derivatives [-3.3.1-] {+3.3.1.+} Servers MAY use the error code when a query must be narrowed to yield a result set acceptable [-to-] {+under+} the policies of the server operator. Newton & Sanz [-Expires-] {+Standards Track [Page 13] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg+} January [-11,-] 2005 [-[Page 14] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004 3.3.2-] {+3.3.2.+} The queries , , and support optional language tags that allow a client to suggest to a server the languages in which to scope the queries. If a client passes to the server a language [-which-] {+that+} the server does not support, the server MAY use this error code to indicate that one of the languages is not supported. This element contains child elements named . Each of these child elements [-specify-] {+specifies+} a language not supported by the server. When a server returns this error, it MUST give the languages from the query which are not supported. [-3.4-] {+3.4.+} Support for The following types of entity classes are recognized by the query of IRIS for this registry: o host-name [-- the-] {+-- The+} fully qualified domain name of a nameserver. [-Yields-] {+It yields+} a (Section 3.2.3) in the response. o host-handle [-- the-] {+-- The+} registry unique identifier given a nameserver. [-Yields-] {+It yields+} a (Section 3.2.3) in the response. o domain-name [-- the-] {+-- The+} fully qualified name of a domain. This a domain name as specified by RFC 1035 [9]. [-Yields-] {+It yields+} a (Section 3.2.2) in the response. o idn [-- the-] {+-- The+} fully qualified name of a domain in nameprep form (see RFC 3491 [15]). [-Yields-] {+It yields+} a (Section 3.2.2) in the response. o domain-handle [-- the-] {+-- The+} registry unique identifier given a domain. [-Yields-] {+It yields+} a (Section 3.2.2) in the response. o contact-handle [-- the-] {+-- The+} registry unique identifier given a contact. [-Yields-] {+It yields+} a (Section 3.2.4) in the response. o ipv4-address [-- the-] {+-- The+} IPv4 address of a nameserver. [-Yields-] {+It yields+} a (Section 3.2.3) in the response. o ipv6-address [-- the-] {+-- The+} IPv6 address of a nameserver. [-Yields-] {+It yields+} a (Section 3.2.3) in the response. o registration-authority [-- the-] {+-- The+} name of a registration authority. [-Yields-] {+It yields+} a (Section 3.2.5) in the response. [-o-] {+Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 14] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg January 2005+} All names in these entity classes are case insensitive. [-Newton & Sanz Expires January 11, 2005 [Page 15] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] 4. Formal XML Syntax This registry schema is specified in the XML Schema notation. The formal syntax presented here is a complete schema representation suitable for automated validation of an XML instance when combined with the formal schema syntax of IRIS. Domain registry schema derived from IRIS schema [- [--] Newton & Sanz [-Expires-] {+Standards Track [Page 18] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg+} January [-11,-] 2005 [-[Page 19] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] {++} [--] Newton & Sanz [-Expires-] {+Standards Track [Page 19] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg+} January [-11,-] 2005 [-[Page 20] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] {++} -] Newton & Sanz [-Expires-] {+Standards Track [Page 20] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg+} January [-11,-] 2005 [-[Page 21] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] {+ref="dreg:partialMatchGroup" />+} [- -] Newton & Sanz [-Expires-] {+Standards Track [Page 22] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg+} January [-11,-] 2005 [-[Page 23] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] {+maxOccurs="1" />+} -] Newton & Sanz [-Expires-] {+Standards Track [Page 25] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg+} January [-11,-] 2005 [-[Page 26] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] {+maxOccurs="1">+} -] Newton & Sanz [-Expires-] {+Standards Track [Page 29] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg+} January [-11,-] 2005 [-[Page 30] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] {+maxOccurs="unbounded" />+} [--] Newton & Sanz [-Expires-] {+Standards Track [Page 31] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg+} January [-11,-] 2005 [-[Page 32] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] [- -] Newton & Sanz [-Expires-] {+Standards Track [Page 32] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg+} January [-11,-] 2005 [-[Page 33] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] {+substitutionGroup="iris:result" /> +} -] Newton & Sanz [-Expires-] {+Standards Track [Page 33] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg+} January [-11,-] 2005 [-[Page 34] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] {+base="normalizedString"> +} [- [- -] Newton & Sanz [-Expires-] {+Standards Track [Page 35] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg+} January [-11,-] 2005 [-[Page 36] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] {+ +} Figure 5: dreg.xsd [-Newton & Sanz Expires January 11, 2005 [Page 37] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] 5. BEEP Transport Compliance IRIS allows several extensions of the core capabilities. This section outlines [-those-] extensions allowable by IRIS-BEEP [6]. [-5.1-] {+5.1.+} Message Pattern This registry type uses the default message pattern [-as-] described in IRIS-BEEP [6]. [-5.2-] {+5.2.+} Server Authentication This registry type only uses the basic TLS server authentication [-method-] {+method,+} as described in IRIS-BEEP [6]. [-Newton & Sanz Expires January 11, 2005 [Page 38] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] 6. URI Resolution [-6.1-] {+6.1.+} Application Service Label The application service label associated with this registry type MUST be "DREG1". This is the abbreviated form of the URN for this registry [-type,-] {+type:+} urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:dreg1. [-6.2-] {+Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 36] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg January 2005 6.2.+} Bottom-Up Resolution The bottom-up alternative resolution method MUST be identified as 'bottom' in IRIS URI's. The process for this resolution method differs from the [-direct-resolution-] {+direct- resolution+} method if the authority is only a domain name [-(i.e.-] {+(i.e.,+} without the port number). The process for this condition is as follows: 1. The IRIS [5] [-direct resolution-] {+direct-resolution+} process is tried on the domain name [-(e.g. "example.com" ).-] {+(e.g., "example.com").+} 2. If the [-direct resolution-] {+direct-resolution+} process yields no server for which a connection can be made, then the leftmost label of the domain name is removed, and the first step is repeated again [-(e.g. "com" ).-] {+(e.g., "com").+} 3. If all the labels of the domain name are removed and no server connections have been made, then the DNS is queried for the address records corresponding to the original domain [-name-] {+name,+} and the port used is the well-known port for the default protocol of IRIS. [-6.3-] {+6.3.+} Top-Down Resolution The top-down alternative resolution method MUST be identified as 'top' in IRIS [-URI's.-] {+URIs.+} The process for this resolution method differs from the [-direct-resolution-] {+direct- resolution+} method if the authority is only a domain name [-(i.e.-] {+(i.e.,+} without the port number). The process for this condition is as follows: 1. The domain name is reduced to its rightmost label. This is always '.'. 2. The IRIS [5] [-direct resolution-] {+direct-resolution+} process is tried on the domain name. 3. If the [-direct resolution-] {+direct-resolution+} process yields no server for which a connection can be made, then the original label to the left of the rightmost label of the domain name is prepended, and the second step is repeated again [-(e.g.-] {+(e.g.,+} if [-"."-] {+".",+} then [-"com",-] {+"com";+} if [-"com"-] {+"com",+} then "example.com"). [-Newton & Sanz Expires January 11, 2005 [Page 39] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] 4. If all the labels of the original domain are present and no server connections have been made, then the DNS is queried for the address records corresponding to the original domain [-name-] {+name,+} and the port used is the well-known port for the default protocol of IRIS. Newton & Sanz [-Expires-] {+Standards Track [Page 37] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg+} January [-11,-] 2005 [-[Page 40] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] 7. Internationalization Considerations Implementers should be aware of considerations for internationalization in IRIS [5]. This document specifies the lookup of domain names, both the traditional ASCII form and the IDN form. In addition, the social data associated with contacts may also be [-non-ASCII,-] {+non-ASCII+} and could contain virtually any Unicode character. The element is provided in queries that have {+the+} potential to traverse such data. Clients should use [-these elements-] {+this element+} to indicate [-to the server of-] the {+desired+} target languages [-desired,-] {+to the server,+} and servers should use [-these elements-] {+this element+} to better enable normalization and search processes (see [18]). [-Clients-] {+For clients+} needing to localize the data tags in this [-protocol should take-] {+protocol,+} note that localization is only needed on the names of XML elements and attributes with the exception of elements containing date and time information. The schema for this registry has been designed so that clients need not interpret the content of elements or attributes for localization, other than [-those-] {+that of+} elements containing date and time information. Clients should also make use of the elements provided in many of the results. Results containing data that may be in Unicode are accompanied by these elements in order to aid better presentation of the data to the user. The "dateTimePrivacyType" element type contains the XML Schema [3] data type "dateTime". The contents of this element MUST be specified {+by+} using the 'Z' indicator for Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). [-Newton & Sanz Expires January 11, 2005 [Page 41] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] 8. IANA Considerations [-8.1-] {+8.1.+} XML Namespace URN Registration This document makes use of a proposed XML namespace and schema registry specified in XML_URN [16]. Accordingly, the following registration information is provided for the IANA: o URN/URI: * urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:dreg1 o Contact: * Andrew Newton * Marcos Sanz o XML: * The XML Schema specified in Section 4 [-8.2-] {+Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 38] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg January 2005 8.2.+} S-NAPTR Registration The following S-NAPTR application service label [-will need to be-] {+has been+} registered with IANA according to the IANA considerations defined in IRIS [5]: DREG1 [-8.3-] {+8.3.+} BEEP Registration The following BEEP Profile URI [-is to be registeried-] {+has been registered+} with IANA, in addition to the registration provided in IRIS-BEEP [6]. http://iana.org/beep/iris1/dreg1 [-Newton & Sanz Expires January 11, 2005 [Page 42] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] 9. Security Considerations This document lays out no new considerations for security precautions beyond that specified in IRIS [5]. [-Newton & Sanz Expires January 11, 2005 [Page 43] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] 10. References [-10.1-] {+10.1.+} Normative References [1] World Wide Web Consortium, "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0", W3C XML, February 1998, [-.-] {+.+} [2] World Wide Web Consortium, "Namespaces in XML", W3C XML Namespaces, January 1999, [-.-] {+.+} [3] World Wide Web Consortium, "XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes", W3C XML Schema, October 2000, [-.-] {+.+} [4] World Wide Web Consortium, "XML Schema Part 1: Structures", W3C XML Schema, October 2000, [-.-] {+.+} [5] Newton, A. and M. Sanz, [-"Internet-] {+"IRIS: The Internet+} Registry Information [-Service", draft-ietf-crisp-iris-core-05 (work in progress), January 2004.-] {+Service (IRIS) Core Protocol", RFC 3981, December 2005.+} [6] Newton, A. and M. Sanz, [-"Internet-] {+"Using the Internet+} Registry Information Service (IRIS) over {+the+} Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol (BEEP)", [-draft-ietf-crisp-iris-beep-05 (work in progress),-] {+RFC 3983, December 2005. Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 39] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg+} January [-2004.-] {+2005+} [7] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Addressing Architecture", RFC 3513, April 2003. [8] Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", STD 5, RFC 791, September 1981. [9] Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - implementation and specification", STD 13, RFC 1035, November 1987. [10] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", [-RFC 2119,-] BCP 14, {+RFC 2119,+} March 1997. [11] International Organization for Standardization, "Codes for the representation of names of countries, 3rd edition", ISO Standard 3166, August 1988. [12] Braden, R., "Requirements for Internet Hosts - Application and Support", STD 3, RFC 1123, October 1989. [13] International Telecommunications Union, "The International [-Newton & Sanz Expires January 11, 2005 [Page 44] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] Public Telecommunication Numbering Plan", ITU-T Recommendation E.164, 1991. [14] Faltstrom, P., Hoffman, [-P.-] {+P.,+} and A. Costello, "Internationalizing Domain Names in Applications (IDNA)", RFC 3490, March 2003. [15] Hoffman, P. and M. Blanchet, "Nameprep: A Stringprep Profile for Internationalized Domain Names (IDN)", RFC 3491, March 2003. [16] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", [-draft-mealling-iana-xmlns-registry-03 (work in progress), November 2001. 10.2-] {+BCP 81, RFC 3688, January 2004. 10.2.+} Informative References [17] Newton, A., "Cross Registry Internet Service Protocol (CRISP) Requirements", RFC 3707, February 2004. [-Newton & Sanz Expires January 11, 2005 [Page 45] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] URIs [18] [-Authors' Addresses Andrew L.-] Newton [-VeriSign, Inc. 21345 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, VA 20166 USA Phone: +1 703 948 3382 EMail: anewton@verisignlabs.com; andy@hxr.us URI: http://www.verisignlabs.com/ Marcos-] {+&+} Sanz [-DENIC eG Wiesenhuettenplatz 26 D-60329 Frankfurt Germany EMail: sanz@denic.de URI: http://www.denic.de/ Newton & Sanz Expires-] {+Standards Track [Page 40] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg+} January [-11,-] 2005 [-[Page 46] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] Appendix A. [-Example-] {+Examples of+} Requests and Responses The examples in this section use the string "C:" to denote data sent by a client to a server and the string "S:" to denote data sent by a server to a client. [-A.1-] {+A.1.+} Example 1 The following is an example of an entity lookup in a dreg1 registry for the domain-name of 'example.com'. The response shows the ability to specify data as being withheld because it is private. C: C: C: C: C: C: C: C: C: C: S: S: S: S: S: S: S: S: S: example.com S: tcs-com-1 S: S: S: S: Newton & Sanz [-Expires-] {+Standards Track [Page 41] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg+} January [-11,-] 2005 [-[Page 47] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] S: S: S: S: S: S: S: S: S: S: S: S: S: S: S: S: S: S: Figure 6: Example 1 [-A.2-] {+A.2.+} Example 2 The following is an example of an entity lookup in a dreg1 registry for the contact-handle of 'mak21'. The response shows the ability to specify data as being withheld because it is private. C: C: C: C: C: C: C: C: C: C: {+S: +} Newton & Sanz [-Expires-] {+Standards Track [Page 42] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg+} January [-11,-] 2005 [-[Page 48] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004 S: -] S: S: S: S: S: S: S: S: mak21 S: S: S: Mark Kosters S: S: S: S: VeriSign, Inc. S: S: S: markk@verisignlabs.com S: S: S: S: S: S: S: S: S: Figure 7: Example 2 [-A.3-] {+A.3.+} Example 3 The following is an example of a domain search based on a registrant's name beginning with the string 'The Cobbler Shoppe'. This example also shows the use of bags. C: C: C: C: C: C: C: com {+Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 43] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg January 2005+} C: C: C: The Cobbler Shoppe C: C: C: registrant C: C: C: C: C: S: S: S: S: S: S: S: example.com S: S: S: S: S: Bill Eckels S: S: S: [-Newton & Sanz Expires January 11, 2005 [Page 50] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] S: S: Mark Kosters {+Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 44] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg January 2005+} S: S: S: S: S: S: S: S: S: S: S: S: S: beb140 S: S: Bill Eckels S: S: en S: S: S: S: Bill sells shoes down by the sea shore. S: S: S: Rechnung verkauft Schuhe unten durch das Seeufer. S: S: S: S: S: The Cobbler Shoppe S: S: S: S:
S: 21 North Main Street S:
{+S: S: Britt+} Newton & Sanz [-Expires-] {+Standards Track [Page 45] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg+} January [-11,-] 2005 [-[Page 51] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004 S: S: Britt-] S: S: S: IA S: S: S: 50423 S: S: S: US S: S:
S: S: [-515-843-3521-] {++1.5158433521+} S: S:
S: S: S: It is illegal to use information from this service S: for the purposes of sending unsolicited bulk email. S: S: S:
S:
S: S: S: S: AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAABIwAAAIEA0ddD+W3Agl0Lel98G1r77fZ S: c3nBl8CHdkmKuVGUy/ijmvdO5QxuSlU0R4BoCLZk/Sob22RApTn S: T+ROMbXFQBrxGH08daAOy98WqpfAutWJri61JLpubIbaqhGyB48 S: Qt69V6OhYfFsJjvoNEOh1k2dgzXhSlzP3OMVSKRlBzGcO8= S: S: S: S: S:
Figure 8: Example 3 Newton & Sanz [-Expires-] {+Standards Track [Page 46] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg+} January [-11,-] 2005 [-[Page 52] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] Appendix B. An Example {+of+} Database Serialization The following is an example of serializing domain data. This example shows the serialization of a domain, a host, and a referral. example.com IANA Administrator nsol184 ns1.iana.org 192.0.2.1 IANA Techie com Figure 9: dreg-serialization.xml [-Newton & Sanz Expires January 11, 2005 [Page 54] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] Appendix C. Acknowledgements Many of the concepts concerning the use of SRV records for step-wise refinement [-towards-] {+toward+} finding authoritative servers and many of the details of result objects in this [-draft-] {+document+} were originally created by Eric A. Hall in his memos regarding the use of LDAP to satisfy the CRISP requirements. These concepts have contributed significantly to the development of this protocol. David Blacka [-gave-] {+made+} many technical contributions [-due to work-] {+based+} on his {+work on+} IRIS implementation and {+his+} experienced [-judgement.-] {+judgment.+} He also contributed many editorial clarifications. Newton & Sanz [-Expires-] {+Standards Track [Page 48] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg+} January [-11,-] 2005 {+Authors' Addresses Andrew L. Newton VeriSign, Inc. 21345 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, VA 20166 USA Phone: +1 703 948 3382 EMail: anewton@verisignlabs.com; andy@hxr.us URI: http://www.verisignlabs.com/ Marcos Sanz DENIC eG Wiesenhuettenplatz 26 D-60329 Frankfurt Germany EMail: sanz@denic.de URI: http://www.denic.de/ Newton & Sanz Standards Track+} [Page [-55] Internet-Draft iris-dreg July 2004-] {+49] RFC 3982 IRIS-Dreg January 2005 Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005). This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights. This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.+} Intellectual Property [-Statement-] The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the {+IETF's+} procedures with respect to rights in [-RFC documents-] {+IETF Documents+} can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at [-ietf-ipr@ietf.org. Disclaimer of Validity This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights. Acknowledgment-] {+ietf- ipr@ietf.org. Acknowledgement+} Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society. Newton & Sanz [-Expires January 11, 2005-] {+Standards Track+} [Page [-56]-] {+50]+}